Skip to main content

Book Review: Christian Theologies of Salvation

Christian Theologies of Salvation: A Comparative Introduction, edited by Justin Holcomb, is comprised of a collection covering the theories of salvation of significant theologians in church history. As stated by Holcomb in the introduction, the role of soteriology is to show how and why Jesus was and continues to be significant. Throughout Christian history there have been a variety of viewpoints and debates. This book will provide one with insight into those debates. Chapters fall into two categories. The book is arranged (mostly) chronologically, and as you reach each era of Christian history a brief treatment of that era is presented. Then you get a series of essays on major figures of that time period. Each of these essays contain some basic historical background on the subject to provide context for the summary of various key themes in their views regarding salvation. The individual essays are descriptive and contain very little evaluation of the viewpoints of the subject (with the exception of the chapter on Rahner and Balthasar). All of the heavy hitters are covered including, but not limited to, Irenaeus, Origen, Anselm, Aquinas, Luther, Wesley, Barth, and Gutierrez. In the remainder of this review I will provide an overview of one of the essays to give you a better sense of what to expect from the book.

R. Jared Staudt is the author of the chapter on Aquinas. He begins his essay with a brief overview of Aquinas' life before moving into a discussion of his soteriology. Staudt begins by stating that for Aquinas, "Salvation has a twofold aspect: the internal liberation from sin by which the soul is renewed and justified (that is, made just by grace), and the cause of that justification which is participation in the justice of Christ's own soul, effected by his work of salvation" (p. 144). Then he moves into specifics. Justification means causing justice, both in the interior state of the soul and in ones actions (p. 145). Another way to put it is a moving of man from a state of sin and bringing rectitude. Injustice is removed as the power of sin is broken (p. 147). This process culminates in deification, our union into the very life of God (p. 147). This deification effects worthiness, or enables us to merit eternal life (p. 149). The source of all of this is, of course, Christ. His mediation via his divine and human nature enables our justification and deification (p. 150). This mediation has five components, satisfaction, merit, atonement, sacrifice, and redemption and is necessitated by our bondage to sin (p. 152). In a nutshell, salvation for Aquinas is a necessarily cooperative effort between God and humanity (p. 153). Without grace, we cannot be saved, but we must cooperate and the new life of justice we live is our own (while again still being dependent upon grace).

Staudt's chapter is typical for what one can expect in this book. Chapters are well organized and highly synthetic, written by scholars who know the whole range of each theologian's writings well. They also are very even in quality with only one which I thought was a bit substandard. Overall, I think this is an excellent book and would be a great textbook in a college or seminary classroom for a class on salvation or in historical theology. I'd highly recommend picking it up.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dating Galatians and Harmonization with Acts

We've gotten to the point where how we date Galatians and where we fit it into the narrative of Acts will affect our interpretation in a significant manner. The first question that we have to address is, which visit to Jerusalem is Paul recounting in Galatians 2:1-10 ? Is it the famine relief visit of Acts 11:27-30 or the Jerusalem council of Acts 15 ? First, I think it's worthwhile to point out that it's not all that obvious. Scholars are divided on this issue (even Evangelical scholars). In favor of the theory of Galatians 2:1-10 referring to the Acts 11 visit are the following: This visit clearly is prompted by a revelation by the Holy Spirit. The Acts 15 gathering seems to be a public gathering, where the one described in Galatians is private. Paul never alludes to a letter sent to the diaspora churches which could have definitively won the case for him. The issue of food laws was already decided by James. Why would men coming from him in Galatians 2:11-14 be advocat...

More Calvinist than Calvin?

I'm working on a paper on the topic of divine sovereignty and human freedom. Occasionally on this topic (or the subtopic of election) you will hear people through out the barb at strong Calvinists that they're 'being more Calvinist than Calvin.' After having read Calvin carefully on the issue I don't think that there's any validity to that charge. I don't see a material difference here between Calvin and say John Piper. Here are several quotes from the Institutes to prove my point. 'All events are governed by God's secret plan.' I.xvi.2 'Governing heaven and earth by his providence, he also so regulates all things that nothing takes place without his deliberation.' I.xvi.3 'Nothing happens except what is knowingly and willingly decreed by him.' I.xvi.3 Calvin explicitly rejects a limited providence, 'one that by a general motion revolves and drives the system of the universe, with its several parts, but which does not specifc...

Galatians 2:11-14: The circumcision group

11 When Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. 12 For before certain people came from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles. But when they arrived, he began to draw back and separate himself from the Gentiles because he was afraid of those who belonged to the circumcision group. 13 The other Jews joined him in his hypocrisy, so that by their hypocrisy even Barnabas was led astray. 14 When I saw that they were not acting in line with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas in front of them all, "You are a Jew, yet you live like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs? (TNIV) There's an important issue that we need to wrestle with in this passage, and it's the question of whether or not the people from James and the circumcision group are the same group. I am not inclined to think that they are. The ensuing discussion is drawn from Longenecker's commentary pp 73-5...