Skip to main content

Book Review: Keeping God's Earth

Thanks to Adrianna of IVP for providing me with a review copy!

One of the hot debates today is over the extent to which we humans are negatively impacting the global environment. Many Evangelicals find themselves uncertain of where the evidence points. They think there's probably a problem but aren't sure how big it is and even if there is a problem, they're not sure how the Bible might guide us towards a solution. It's for this group (in which I would have included myself) that Keeping God's Earth: The Global Environment in Biblical Perspective is written.

The book starts with an introduction and an essay on the environment and eschatology. Then, four major ecological issues are tackled: cities, biodiversity, water, and climate change. Each of these four sections has two articles. The first is written by a leading Christian scientist in that field assessing the problem and the second is written by a biblical scholar providing the theological backbone necessary to help us address the issues raised in the prior essay (this was a very helpful format). The book closes with a concluding essay that synthesizes some of the conclusions drawn earlier and with an afterword that clarifies what it means for humankind to have dominion over creation.

Gauging by the level of the essays, the book is best geared towards the studious lay person, pastor, or student. The only exception may be Noah Toly's essay on 'Cities and the Global Environment.' I found that it was unnecessarily advanced at times given that the vast majority of those who read this book will generally be unfamiliar with environmental science (as I am). In fairness he did define technical terms when he used them, but their usage combined with his academic writing style made his essay harder work than necessary to get through. Overall, though, each of the essays did an excellent job of distilling their material in a nuanced, lucid, and accessible manner.

One helpful angle that many of the essays took was to show how the environmental crisis impacts human well being and the social justice aspects of many of our ecological problems. In particular, the essays that focused on science showed how often the poor get the short end of the stick, especially related to pollution of their environment and their inability to access safe water in many parts of the world. Another strength was the way the essayists attempted to undermine the strong current in pockets of Evangelical thought that believes that because we were given dominion over the earth that we can do with it and its inhabitants as we please. Our role as image-bearers, as God's representatives on earth, is to be an extension of his beneficent rule, and that being just rulers in the biblical sense requires that we look out for the vulnerable.

Most of the theological essays are fairly reserved in the conclusions they give. They serve as a good starting point for further reflection and leave implementation up to the individual. The eschatological focus of Doug Moo's and Christopher Wright's essays were particularly helpful (all in all I thought Wright's was the standout of the collection). I especially appreciated how Wright used eschatology to ground environmental ethics in the mission of God. If redeeming the cosmos is one of God's goals, then it must be one of our goals too, and it must be a goal that we pursue in its own right, not just as a subsidiary goal to evangelism.

Overall, Keeping God's Earth is a much needed resource for the ongoing discussion of environmental ethics. When you are done reading it you will be convinced of the centrality of creation care to the mission of God's people. For far too long we have sat on the sidelines or even fought against policies that would promote the health of the environment. Keeping God's Earth is an excellent resource providing us with the theological grounding we need to bring God glory by fulfilling our roles as image bearers exercising his benevolent kingship over all of creation and participating in his mission of redeeming all of creation.


Popular posts from this blog

Commentary Series Overview

When I write commentary reviews, one of my main goals is to assess how well the commentator hit the intended audience of the commentary and utilized the format of the commentary. This often necessitates cluttering up the post discussing issues of format. To eliminate that, I thought that I would make some general remarks about the format and audience of each of the series that appear in my reviews. Terms like liberal, conservative, etc. are not used pejoratively but simply as descriptors. Many of you are familiar with Jeremy Pierce's commentary series overview. If you don't see a particular series covered here, check out his post to see if it's reviewed there. I am making no attempt at covering every series, just the series that I use. Additionally, new series (such as the NCCS) have been started in the five years since he wrote his very helpful guide, so I thought that it might not be completely out of order to have another person tackle commentary series overviews. This…

Paul's Argument in Galatians 3:15-29

15 Brothers and sisters, let me take an example from everyday life. Just as no one can set aside or add to a human covenant that has been duly established, so it is in this case. 16 The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. Scripture does not say “and to seeds,” meaning many people, but “and to your seed,” meaning one person, who is Christ. 17 What I mean is this: The law, introduced 430 years later, does not set aside the covenant previously established by God and thus do away with the promise. 18 For if the inheritance depends on the law, then it no longer depends on the promise; but God in his grace gave it to Abraham through a promise. 19 Why, then, was the law given at all? It was added because of transgressions until the Seed to whom the promise referred had come. The law was given through angels and entrusted to a mediator. 20 A mediator, however, implies more than one party; but God is one. 21 Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! Fo…

Doctor Who: Rose Tyler - Traitor?

The end of season four was very, very controversial. When I first saw it, I felt cheated. I was angry. The more I think about it, the more I think I see what Russell Davies was doing. He is too good of a writer and the show is too carefully crafted for him to screw up Rose's character and the end of a four season storyline. So while the ending isn't strictly part of our series, it is tangentially related, and I've agonized over that scene in Bad Wolf Bay so much that I have to write about it. :)

To briefly set things up, near the end of the final episode of season four, there is a meta-crisis, that results in a part human. part Time Lord Doctor being generated. He has all of the Doctor's memories, and thinks and acts like the Doctor. However, importantly, he only has one heart and cannot regenerate. He only has one life to live. The meta-crisis Doctor brought full resolution to the battle fought against the Daleks, and in the process, wiped them out. Thus, the real Doc…