Skip to main content

Recommended Bible Study Resources: NT for the Lay Bible Study Leader

A friend of mine at church recently asked me for help building a his personal library. I thought that it would be helpful to post my recommendations here as well. This first of two posts will cover New Testament study resources geared towards the lay Bible study leader. They have, in my opinion, sufficient detail for really engaging the text, but not too technical so as to limit their utility for someone without formal training. I don't claim to have examined every commentary for any book at this level, but I do believe that each of these would be a very helpful to a lay person putting together a Bible study. I also tried to select commentaries that are priced reasonably but occasionally I did recommend slightly more expensive commentaries. This page will be periodically updated as I read commentaries I haven't checked out before or as new ones are published. I will also add in some additional books that are not commentaries as time goes on.

NT Introduction and Theology:
Introducing the New Testament Its Literature and Theology - Paul Achtemeier, Joel Green, and Marianne Meye Thompson
New Testament Theology: Many Witnesses, One Gospel - I. Howard Marshall

Commentaries (series abbreviations in parenthesis are defined below):
Matthew (NAC) - Craig Blomberg
Mark (NIVAC) - David Garland
Luke (NIVAC) - Darrell Bock
John (IVP) - Rodney Whitacre
The Book of Acts (NICNT) - FF Bruce
Romans (NCCS) - Craig Keener (review)
First Corinthians (INT) - Richard Hays
2 Corinthians (IVP) - Linda Belleville
Galatians (NIVAC) - Scot McKnight
Ephesians (NIVAC) - Klyne Sondgrass
Philippians (NIVAC) - Frank Theilman
Colossians and Philemon (TNTC) - N.T. Wright
1-2 Thessalonians (IVP) - Greg Beale
1-2 Timothy & Titus (IVP) - Philip Towner
Hebrews (NIVAC) - George Guthrie
James (NIBCNT) - Peter Davids
1 Peter (TNTC) - Wayne Grudem
2 Peter & Jude (IVP) - Robert Harvey and Philip Towner
1-3 John (IVP) - Marianne Meye Thompson
Revelation (NIVAC) - Craig Keener

Key (Here I tried to link to the publishers page here when possible)
INT: Interpretation
IVP: IVP Commentary
NAC: New American Commentary
NCCS: New Covenant Commentary Series
NIBCNT: New International Biblical Commentary on the New Testament
NICNT: New International Commentary on the New Testament
NIVAC: NIV Application Commentary
TNTC: Tyndale New Testament Commentary
Labels:

Comments

  1. dannyJune 14, 2010 at 4:15 PM

    Hard to argue with this list... but I'll try. =)

    Actually, the only possible adjustments are make are these:

    Tom Schreiner on 1-2 Peter, Jude (NAC)- more cost effective (1 volume) and is better (in my opinion) than Grudem on 1 Peter. Haven't used Harvey & Towner on 2 Peter & Jude so I don't know.

    Doug Moo on James- if his Pillar commentary is too advanced, his Tyndale commentary is still good. Toss up between him and Davids, so I wouldn't necessarily change it.

    Fee on the Pastorals- Towner may be better, just throwing this out there.

    Howard Marshall on Acts- Tyndale commentary is really good.

    As for NT Intros, I don't like any. In fact, I don't like any OT Intros, either.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Marcus MaherJune 14, 2010 at 4:33 PM

    I did think about Schreiner on 1+2 Peter and Jude. The difficulty was that when I gave my friend 4 commentaries on 1 Peter to gauge the style he liked, Schreiner was checked out of the library. I gave him Grudem and he really liked it and when I was just getting my feet wet studying I loved that commentary too. But perhaps I should have gone with Schreiner. It was a tough call.

    I have Marshall in the Tyndale series and I like it (but admittedly haven't used it a lot). I waffled on that one a bit, but I felt he interacts a bit too much with other scholars in the main text which I think makes it a bit less useful for lay people. One I haven't checked out is Larkin's in the IVP series. Have you?

    James was one of the borderline cases for me. It ultimately came down to the fact that I think Davids is just a tad bit more accessible.

    Much of my choice of Towner was based on his effort in the NICNT. I really like that commentary. Fee is never a bad choice though.

    I actually like the intro I recommended. It spends a fair amount of time on literary which is sometimes overlooked in NT Intros. It's also from a moderate Evangelical position which I find to be a bonus. That said I like it, but I don't love it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. dannyJune 14, 2010 at 7:42 PM

    I forgot about Larkin on Acts. I've never used it, but it comes highly recommended.

    I also forgot about the Expositor's series (revised nowadays). Carson on Matthew and Longenecker on Acts stand out in my mind as good ones from that series.

    ReplyDelete
  4. UnknownJune 20, 2010 at 5:13 PM

    If you plan to refer lay leaders to this post in the future, it might be good to write out the commentary series names instead of having the abbreviation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Marcus MaherJune 21, 2010 at 1:15 PM

    Thanks for the suggestion Brett, I added a key to the abbreviations below.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More Calvinist than Calvin?

I'm working on a paper on the topic of divine sovereignty and human freedom. Occasionally on this topic (or the subtopic of election) you will hear people through out the barb at strong Calvinists that they're 'being more Calvinist than Calvin.' After having read Calvin carefully on the issue I don't think that there's any validity to that charge. I don't see a material difference here between Calvin and say John Piper. Here are several quotes from the Institutes to prove my point. 'All events are governed by God's secret plan.' I.xvi.2 'Governing heaven and earth by his providence, he also so regulates all things that nothing takes place without his deliberation.' I.xvi.3 'Nothing happens except what is knowingly and willingly decreed by him.' I.xvi.3 Calvin explicitly rejects a limited providence, 'one that by a general motion revolves and drives the system of the universe, with its several parts, but which does not specifc
17 comments
Read more

Dating Galatians and Harmonization with Acts

We've gotten to the point where how we date Galatians and where we fit it into the narrative of Acts will affect our interpretation in a significant manner. The first question that we have to address is, which visit to Jerusalem is Paul recounting in Galatians 2:1-10 ? Is it the famine relief visit of Acts 11:27-30 or the Jerusalem council of Acts 15 ? First, I think it's worthwhile to point out that it's not all that obvious. Scholars are divided on this issue (even Evangelical scholars). In favor of the theory of Galatians 2:1-10 referring to the Acts 11 visit are the following: This visit clearly is prompted by a revelation by the Holy Spirit. The Acts 15 gathering seems to be a public gathering, where the one described in Galatians is private. Paul never alludes to a letter sent to the diaspora churches which could have definitively won the case for him. The issue of food laws was already decided by James. Why would men coming from him in Galatians 2:11-14 be advocat
19 comments
Read more

Galatians 2:11-14: The circumcision group

11 When Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. 12 For before certain people came from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles. But when they arrived, he began to draw back and separate himself from the Gentiles because he was afraid of those who belonged to the circumcision group. 13 The other Jews joined him in his hypocrisy, so that by their hypocrisy even Barnabas was led astray. 14 When I saw that they were not acting in line with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas in front of them all, "You are a Jew, yet you live like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to follow Jewish customs? (TNIV) There's an important issue that we need to wrestle with in this passage, and it's the question of whether or not the people from James and the circumcision group are the same group. I am not inclined to think that they are. The ensuing discussion is drawn from Longenecker's commentary pp 73-5
Post a Comment
Read more